Each fact checker’s queue is generated specifically for the territory they operate in our queue is supposed to prioritize UK-centric content. I hadn’t seen this much detail previously about what the “queue” entails, so quoting liberally here:įact checkers working on the Third Party Fact Checking program are provided by Facebook with a “queue” of content (such as text posts, images, videos and links) that it has identified as possibly false. Here are some of the report’s findings, observations, and recommendations.įull Fact provides a useful overview of what, exactly, it’s presented with as a third-party fact-checker. If you’re keeping track of how much Facebook’s fact-checking partners make and trying to guess rates, note that France’s Libération received $245,000 for 290 fact-checks in 2018.) (In the report, Full Fact describes building networks with medical and health-related organizations, police departments, academics, and so on. A little back-of-the-envelope math shows this works out to about $1,790 per fact-check, with some obviously requiring more work than others. “However, there is also a need to scale up the volume of content and speed of response” - being available in a lot of countries isn’t enough if individual country partners are only able to skim the surface of misleading content.Īnd - like other third-party fact-checking partners - Full Fact wants Facebook “to share more data with fact-checkers, so that we can better evaluate content we are checking and evaluate our impact.” It’s not very satisfying to feel as if your fact-checks are falling into a black hole, where you’re unsure how many people will ever see them or how much of a dent you’re making.ĭuring the six-month period, Full Fact published 96 fact-checks as part of its participation in Facebook’s program, and Facebook paid it $171,800 (“the amount of money that Full Fact is entitled to depends on the amount of fact-checking done under the program”). “Facebook’s focus seems to be increasing scale by extending the Third Party Fact Checking Program to more languages and countries,” the report notes. (All partners must be members of Poynter’s International Fact-Checking Network, though that hasn’t completely prevented disputes over who should qualify to be a fact-checker some original partners like Snopes have dropped out.) Six months in, the organization has released a report about its experience so far - what it’s learned, what it likes, and what it thinks needs to change.įull Fact’s two major concerns about the fact-checking program are scale and transparency - ongoing complaints among Facebook’s partners. fact-checking organization, signed on as one of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking partners in January.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |